<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO childs play &#8211; or not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betterlanguages.com/seo-childs-play-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betterlanguages.com/seo-childs-play-or-not/</link>
	<description>Timely Translations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.betterlanguages.com/seo-childs-play-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterlanguages.com/?p=1101#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Hi Francine
Your experience sounds even worse than mine. In general I don&#039;t like direct mail at the best of times. Not sure what the success rate is, but I seem to remember that it has one of the worst marketing hit rates. Received another annoying one today. A brochure from an estate agent marketing space in an award winning low carbon building I attended a meeting in recently. What was annoying was that they&#039;ve worsened the carbon footprint by direct mailing companies about an eco-friendly building! A more creative and environmentally friendly approach would have been much more appropriate. 
Regards
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Francine<br />
Your experience sounds even worse than mine. In general I don&#8217;t like direct mail at the best of times. Not sure what the success rate is, but I seem to remember that it has one of the worst marketing hit rates. Received another annoying one today. A brochure from an estate agent marketing space in an award winning low carbon building I attended a meeting in recently. What was annoying was that they&#8217;ve worsened the carbon footprint by direct mailing companies about an eco-friendly building! A more creative and environmentally friendly approach would have been much more appropriate.<br />
Regards<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine Pickering</title>
		<link>http://www.betterlanguages.com/seo-childs-play-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine Pickering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterlanguages.com/?p=1101#comment-63</guid>
		<description>What a disspiriting tale but, sadly, it&#039;s not uncommon.  I wonder if it&#039;s down to people being so keen to take a &quot;creative&quot; approach to marketing in an understandable desire to stand out from the crowd (as they say) which ends up with them being &quot;creative&quot; for &quot;creative&quot;&#039;s sake.  Some wacky stunt can easily undermine a business&#039; credibility and this is a particulr danger in the business-to-business arena where humour can be useful but needs to be handled with care.  It&#039;s no wonder you felt insulted by this prank.  

Not so long ago I received a similarly &quot;creative&quot; piece of direct mail - a fake newspaper cutting extolling the virtues of a business advice provider.  The envelope was postmarked from the West Midlands and the cutting had a hand-written post-it note attached recommending the provider and signed by &quot;J&quot;.  Worth a try, I guess, but given that I don&#039;t know anyone who would sign themselves &quot;J&quot; let alone someone in the West Midlands who would do that, this was quickly rumbled as being downright deceitful and an insult to my intelligence.

I&#039;d add to your tips: think about the knock-on effects to your reputation BEFORE to get enthralled by the idea of a crazy creative promotional trick - is it really worth coming across as patronising, manipulative or even worse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a disspiriting tale but, sadly, it&#8217;s not uncommon.  I wonder if it&#8217;s down to people being so keen to take a &#8220;creative&#8221; approach to marketing in an understandable desire to stand out from the crowd (as they say) which ends up with them being &#8220;creative&#8221; for &#8220;creative&#8221;&#8216;s sake.  Some wacky stunt can easily undermine a business&#8217; credibility and this is a particulr danger in the business-to-business arena where humour can be useful but needs to be handled with care.  It&#8217;s no wonder you felt insulted by this prank.  </p>
<p>Not so long ago I received a similarly &#8220;creative&#8221; piece of direct mail &#8211; a fake newspaper cutting extolling the virtues of a business advice provider.  The envelope was postmarked from the West Midlands and the cutting had a hand-written post-it note attached recommending the provider and signed by &#8220;J&#8221;.  Worth a try, I guess, but given that I don&#8217;t know anyone who would sign themselves &#8220;J&#8221; let alone someone in the West Midlands who would do that, this was quickly rumbled as being downright deceitful and an insult to my intelligence.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d add to your tips: think about the knock-on effects to your reputation BEFORE to get enthralled by the idea of a crazy creative promotional trick &#8211; is it really worth coming across as patronising, manipulative or even worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

